Patch for dlditool
stsp at stsp.name
Mon Oct 8 21:18:25 CEST 2007
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:23:23PM +0000, Ewan Meadows wrote:
> > ok, used your makefile, with the vendor source and commited it for version
> > r1972. I kept you 8kb stack size since it seemed to work fine.
> > Troy(GPF)
> > --
> Excellent, I love it when someone else does everything for me!
Learn svn already dammit! :)
> Now onto the burning question: Do I submit my tar/bzip2/gzip ports or
> do we just upgrade busybox to a newer version?
It does not hurt to have both in the tree.
If the current busybox versions still suck badly we can try
to include them side by side and make sure the big binaries have
a different name than the busybox versions, eg. "gtar" for GNU tar.
Or simply tell people not to compile both into the same image.
http://stsp.name PGP Key: 0xF59D25F0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.dslinux.in-berlin.de/pipermail/dslinux-devel-dslinux.in-berlin.de/attachments/20071008/c2418956/attachment.pgp
More information about the dslinux-devel