PIXIL development - now?
amadeus at iksw-muees.de
Sun Sep 23 00:32:19 CEST 2007
On Samstag, 22. September 2007, Nanomad wrote:
> Ok, got it running here too
> Seems a bit sluggish, but it is working almost fine.
> Maybe we could improve pixil in this way:
> Converting fork() to vfork() is handy for testing purposes under
> uClinux, but I think we should go on and convert those fork() into
> pthreads calls (since libpthread is working, right?).
Can you explain WHY we should do this?
Pthreads are implemented as calls to vfork(), so you get nothing.
We're back to the times when men were men
and wrote their own device drivers.
More information about the dslinux-devel