PIXIL development - now?

[Amadeus]

Hello Nanomad,

On Samstag, 22. September 2007, Nanomad wrote:
> Ok, got it running here too
> Seems a bit sluggish, but it is working almost fine.
> Maybe we could improve pixil in this way:
> Converting fork() to vfork() is handy for testing purposes under
> uClinux, but I think we should go on and convert those fork() into
> pthreads calls (since libpthread is working, right?).

Can you explain WHY we should do this?

Pthreads are implemented as calls to vfork(), so you get nothing.

regards
Amadeus
-- 
We're back to the times when men were men 
and wrote their own device drivers.

(Linus Torvalds)