Nano-X speedup
Amadeus
amadeus at iksw-muees.de
Fri Oct 5 17:58:34 CEST 2007
Stefan,
On Freitag, 5. Oktober 2007, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Is an extra list of known huge programs more managable than
> an extra build with a custom vendor config? I don't know.
Yes, I think so. This list will be pretty small. Because... the internal
RAM is also small. Only a few selected programs will come into this
list. It's not HUGE programs, it's "programs with need for speed".
> The second is that I think that most people would like to boot
> directly into the GUI by default once it is usable, but some purists
> (like me ;) don't want that
So if you have extra RAM, what build would YOU prefer?
> , or more seriously, we CANNOT do that
> without making DSLinux unusable for people without RAM expansions.
Yes, of course.
> I thought this would be a nice opportunity to address both
> these issues in one go, with seperate builds being the obvious
> solution, one with GUI and one without, and different rc.default
> settings (start_pixil="YES" vṡ. start_pixil="NO").
I don't think that start_pixil and have_extra_ram is the same...
I have commited the 2 nds-files solution to svn. Let's look how users
think about it!
(It was pretty easy to do, and the makefile has needed a cleanup
anyway).
regards
Amadeus
--
We're back to the times when men were men
and wrote their own device drivers.
(Linus Torvalds)
More information about the dslinux-devel
mailing list