Common build for all supercards?
amadeus at iksw-muees.de
Tue Aug 22 14:30:51 CEST 2006
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 13:53, Malcolm wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Amadeus <amadeus at iksw-muees.de> wrote:
> > (in fact, I think we should not have different named mountpoints
> > even if the architecture is different. Why???)
> It happened that way because I created /gbamp when that was the only
> supported device.
> I'm happy for it to be changed to /mnt or /media or something.
Hmm... /media is a directory, not a common mountpoint.
/mnt is a temporary mountpoint. I would like it to be reserved for
temporaries, maybe NFS mounts or whatever.
How about /card, because all of our mounts are on some sort of memory
Or is there any evidence we must use a more "standard" name, and which
> > What do you think?
> Until yesterday I would have said no because it would waste RAM
> having both drivers loaded.
We're back to the times when men were men
and wrote their own device drivers.
More information about the dslinux-devel