PIXIL development - now?
Amadeus
amadeus at iksw-muees.de
Sun Sep 23 00:32:19 CEST 2007
Hello Nanomad,
On Samstag, 22. September 2007, Nanomad wrote:
> Ok, got it running here too
> Seems a bit sluggish, but it is working almost fine.
> Maybe we could improve pixil in this way:
> Converting fork() to vfork() is handy for testing purposes under
> uClinux, but I think we should go on and convert those fork() into
> pthreads calls (since libpthread is working, right?).
Can you explain WHY we should do this?
Pthreads are implemented as calls to vfork(), so you get nothing.
regards
Amadeus
--
We're back to the times when men were men
and wrote their own device drivers.
(Linus Torvalds)
More information about the dslinux-devel
mailing list